This file consist of a complete bibliography for this book sorted alphabetically


Dec 2020. URL:


Aug 2021. URL:


Norwegian Digitalisation Agency. Norwegian Licence for Open Government Data (NLOD) 2.0. Aug 2020. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Monya Baker. Reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533(26):353–66, 2016.


Alex Ball. How to License Research Data - DCC. Nov 2020. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Lorena A. Barba. Terminologies for Reproducible Research. arXiv, Feb 2018. URL:, arXiv:1802.03311.


C. Glenn Begley and Lee M. Ellis. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391):531–533, Mar 2012. doi:10.1038/483531a.


C. Glenn Begley and John P. A. Ioannidis. Reproducibility in Science. Circ. Res., Jan 2015. URL:


Abeba Birhane. Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2):100205, 2021. URL:


Jenny Bryan. How to name files. May 2015. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


John Burnham. Developments in social grrraaacceeesss: visible–invisible and voiced–unvoiced. In Culture and reflexivity in systemic psychotherapy, pages 139–160. Routledge, 2012. URL:


Evan W. Carr, Andrew Reece, Gabriella Rosen Kellerman, and Alexi Robichaux. The Value of Belonging at Work. Dec 2019. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Elodie Chabrol. Practical tips for scientists using twitter, in A comprehensive guide to science communication. Apr 2021. NULL. URL:


Veronika Cheplygina, Felienne Hermans, Casper Albers, Natalia Bielczyk, and Ionica Smeets. Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(2):1–9, 2020. Publisher: Public Library of Science. URL:, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007513.


Neil P. Chue Hong, Daniel S. Katz, Michelle Barker, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Carlos Martinez, Fotis E. Psomopoulos, Jen Harrow, Leyla Jael Castro, Morane Gruenpeter, Paula Andrea Martinez, and Tom Honeyman. Fair principles for research software (fair4rs principles). 2021. doi:10.15497/RDA00065.


Jon F. Claerbout and Martin Karrenbach. Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. Jan 1992. [Online; accessed 27. May 2020]. URL:, doi:


Patricia Hill Collins. Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. In Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. HarperCollins Academic, 1990. URL:


Nicholas Colvard, Edward Watson, and Hyojin Park. The Impact of Open Educational Resources on Various Student Success Metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2):262–276, 2018.


Creative Commons. About CC Licenses - Creative Commons. May 2020. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Open Data Commons. Licenses - Open Data Commons: legal tools for open data. Oct 2020. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Sasha Costanza-Chock. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, 2020. URL:


Wind Cowles. Research Guides: Research Data Management at Princeton: File naming and structure. Oct 2020. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Kimberlé Crenshaw. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, pages 139, 1989. URL:


Tucker Cummings. Does the Pomodoro Technique Work for Your Productivity? Apr 2020. URL:


Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. Data feminism. MIT press, 2020. URL:


Rob B. M. de Vries, Kimberley E. Wever, Marc T. Avey, Martin L. Stephens, Emily S. Sena, and Marlies Leenaars. The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. ILAR J., 55(3):427–437, Dec 2014. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilu043.


Ulrich Dirnagl and Martin Lauritzen. Fighting publication bias: introducing the negative results section. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 30(7):1263–1264, 2010. PMID: 20596038. URL:, arXiv:, doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.51.


Monica Duke. How to Write a Lay Summary - DCC How-to Guides. Digital Curation Centre, June 2012. [Online; accessed 7. June. 2021]. URL:


Patrick Dunleavy and Jane Tinkler. Maximizing the Impacts of Academic Research. Red Globe Press: London, Jan 2021. URL:


Eric A. Fong and Allen W. Wilhite. Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLOS ONE, 12:1–34, 12 2017. URL:, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187394.


Tove Faber Frandsen and Jeppe Nicolaisen. What is in a name? credit assignment practices in different disciplines. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4):608–617, October 2010. URL:, doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010.


Juliana Freire and Fernando Seabra Chirigati. Provenance and the different flavors of reproducibility. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 41(1):15–26, 2018. URL:


Siiri Fuchs and Mari Elisa Kuusniemi. Making a research project understandable - Guide for data documentation. Zenodo, Dec 2018. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1914401.


Leyla Garcia, Bérénice Batut, Melissa L. Burke, Mateusz Kuzak, Fotis Psomopoulos, Ricardo Arcila, Teresa K. Attwood, Niall Beard, Denise Carvalho-Silva, Alexandros C. Dimopoulos, Victoria Dominguez del Angel, Michel Dumontier, Kim T. Gurwitz, Roland Krause, Peter McQuilton, Loredana Le Pera, Sarah L. Morgan, Päivi Rauste, Allegra Via, Pascal Kahlem, Gabriella Rustici, Celia W. G. van Gelder, and Patricia M. Palagi. Ten simple rules for making training materials fair. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(5):1–9, 05 2020. URL:, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007854.


Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. Datasheets for datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09010, 2018. URL:


Robert Gentleman and Duncan Temple Lang. Statistical Analyses and Reproducible Research. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 16(1):1–23, Mar 2007. doi:10.1198/106186007X178663.


Sarah Goff-Dupont. How to be a successful project owner (without micromanaging). Work Life by Atlassian, Aug 2020. URL:


Donna Haraway. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3):575–599, 1988. URL:


Wilhelm Hasselbring, Leslie Carr, Simon Hettrick, Heather Packer, and Thanassis Tiropanis. How should individual participant data (IPD) from publicly funded clinical trials be shared? BMC Medicine, 13(298):1–7, 2015. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0532-z.


Wilhelm Hasselbring, Leslie Carr, Simon Hettrick, Heather Packer, and Thanassis Tiropanis. From FAIR research data toward FAIR and open research software. Information Technology, 62(1):39–47, 2020. doi:10.1515/itit-2019-0040.


Michael A. Heroux, Lorena Barba, Manish Parashar, Victoria Stodden, and Michela Taufer. Toward a Compatible Reproducibility Taxonomy for Computational and Computing Sciences. OSTI.GOV collections, Oct 2018. [Online; accessed 27. May 2020]. URL:, doi:10.2172/1481626.


Amy Hodge. Best practices for file naming. 2015. [Online; accessed 19. Nov. 2020]. URL:


Andrew Gary Darwin Holmes. Researcher positionality-a consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research-a new researcher guide. International Journal of Education, 8(4):1–10, 2020. URL:


Daniel Hook. Feb 2021. URL:


John P. A. Ioannidis. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8):null, 08 2005. URL:, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.


John P. A. Ioannidis, Sander Greenland, Mark A. Hlatky, Muin J. Khoury, Malcolm R. Macleod, David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, and Robert Tibshirani. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet, 383(9912):166–175, Jan 2014. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8.


Peter Ivie and Douglas Thain. Reproducibility in Scientific Computing. ACM Comput. Surv., 51(3):1–36, Jul 2018. doi:10.1145/3186266.


Danielle Jacobson and Nida Mustafa. Social identity map: a reflexivity tool for practicing explicit positionality in critical qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18:1609406919870075, 2019. URL:


Anisa JN Jafar. What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 2018. URL:, doi:10.1136/emermed-2017-207158.


Mijke Jetten, Boudewijn van den Berg, Mateusz Kuzak, Iza Witkowska, Lena Karvovskaya, Carlos Teijeiro Barjas, Ellen Leenarts, Fieke Schoots, Maria Cruz, Esther Plomp, Ellen Verbakel, Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Barteld Braaksma, Ruurd Schoonhoven, and Ingeborg Verheul. 23 Things: Support for Research Data. Updated version for the Dutch Community by the LCRDM task group RDA/23 Things. October 2019. URL:, doi:10.5281/zenodo.3465896.


Mijke Jetten, Marjan Grootveld, Annemie Mordant, Mascha Jansen, Margreet Bloemers, Margriet Miedema, and Celia W.G. van Gelder. Professionalising data stewardship in the Netherlands. Competences, training and education. Dutch roadmap towards national implementation of FAIR data stewardship. March 2021. URL:, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4623713.


Fani Kelesidou and Elodie Chabrol. A comprehensive guide to science communication. Hindawi Limited, Apr 2021. URL:


Carol Kilkenny, Nick Parsons, Ed Kadyszewski, Michael F. W. Festing, Innes C. Cuthill, Derek Fry, Jane Hutton, and Douglas G. Altman. Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals. PLoS One, 4(11):e7824, Nov 2009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007824.


Kevin Kunzmann, Michael J Grayling, Kim May Lee, David S Robertson, Kaspar Rufibach, and James Wason. A review of Bayesian perspectives on sample size derivation for confirmatory trials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15715, 2020. URL:


Arja Kuula. Methodological and ethical dilemmas of archiving qualitative data. IASSIST Quarterly, 34(3-4):35, 2010. URL:


Mozilla Science Lab. Mozilla science labs study group. GitHub, 2016.


Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Leyla Garcia, Mateusz Kuzak, Carlos Martinez, Ricardo Arcila, Eva Martin Del Pico, Victoria Dominguez Del Angel, Stephanie van de Sandt, Jon Ison, Paula Andrea Martinez, Peter McQuilton, Alfonso Valencia, Jennifer Harrow, Fotis Psomopoulos, Josep Gelpi, Neil Chue Hong, Carole Goble, and Salvador Capella-Gutierrez. Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science, 3(1):37–59, 2020. doi:10.3233/DS-190026.


Florian Markowetz. Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly. Genome Biol., 16(1):1–4, Dec 2015. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0850-7.


Ben Marwick, Carl Boettiger, and Lincoln Mullen. Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). PeerJ Preprints, Mar 2018. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.3192v2.


Loyola University Maryland. Why Ethics are Important in Data Science by Loyola University Maryland. Jun 2018. [Online; accessed 8. Jun. 2020]. URL:


Peggy McIntosh. White privilege: unpacking the invisible knapsack. 1988. URL:


Erin C. McKiernan, Philip E. Bourne, C. Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall, Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, Brian A. Nosek, Karthik Ram, Courtney K. Soderberg, Jeffrey R. Spies, Kaitlin Thaney, Andrew Updegrove, Kara H. Woo, and Tal Yarkoni. Point of View: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, Jul 2016. doi:10.7554/eLife.16800.


Michelle Meyer. Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1):131––144, 2018. doi:10.1177/2515245917747656.


Daniel Nuest, Markus Konkol, Edzer Pebesma, Christian Kray, Marc Schutzeichel, Holger Przibytzin, and Joerg Lorenz. Opening the publication process with executable research compendia. D-Lib Magazine, Jan 2017. URL:, doi:10.1045/january2017-nuest.


Corporate. Directorate-General for Internal Policies Of the Union. Legal aspects of free and open source software : compilation of briefing notes. Publications Office of the European Union, Dec 2013. ISBN 978-92-823-4570-2. URL:


Michaela Panter. Credit where credit is due: best practices for authroship attribution. 2021. [Online; accessed 11. Aug. 2021]. URL:


H. Piwowar, J. Priem, V. Lariviere, J.P. Alperin, L. Matthias, B. Norlander, A. Farley, J. West, and S Haustein. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6:e4375, Feb 2018. doi:10.7717/peerj.4375.


Hans E. Plesser. Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology. Front. Neuroinf., Jan 2018. doi:10.3389/fninf.2017.00076.


C. MIRJAM VAN PRAAG and BERNARD M.S. VAN PRAAG. The benefits of being economics professor a (rather than z). Economica, 75(300):782–796, November 2008. URL:, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00653.x.


Protection Regulation. Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, 2016. URL:


Britta Ricker. Reflexivity, positionality and rigor in the context of big data research. In Thinking Big Data in Geography: New Regimes, New Research. University of Iowa Press, 2017. URL:


Salome Scholtens, Mijke Jetten, Jasmin Böhmer, Christine Staiger, Inge Slouwerhof, Marije van der Geest, and Celia W.G. van Gelder. Final report: Towards FAIR data steward as profession for the lifesciences. Report of a ZonMw funded collaborative approach built on existing expertise. October 2019. URL:, doi:10.5281/zenodo.3474789.


Malvika Sharan. Open communities and promoting a culture of collaboration. Zenodo, Apr 2020. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3745008.


Malvika Sharan. Can we reimagine FAIR for building communities in open science? Zenodo, Sep 2021. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5518163.


Victoria Stodden. May 2014. [Online; accessed 27. May 2020]. URL:


David Stuart, Grace Baynes, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Katie Allin, Dan Penny, Mithu Lucraft, and Mathias Astell. Whitepaper: Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing. figshare, Mar 2018. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5975011.v1.


Jonathan P. Tennant, Francois Waldner, Damien C. Jacques, Paola Masuzzo, Lauren B. Collister, and Chris. H. J. Hartgerink. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5:632, Sep 2016. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.3.


Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge. February 2009. [Online; accessed 5. May 2021]. URL:


Yasemin Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Nicolas Dintzner, and Marta Teperek. Reproducibility Starts from You Today. Patterns, 1(6):100099, Sep 2020. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100099.


Richard Van Noorden. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network. Nature, 512:126–129, 08 2014. URL:, doi:10.1038/512126a.


Ingeborg Verheul, Imming, Melanie, Jacquelijn Ringersma, Annemie Mordant, Jan-Lucas van der Ploeg, and Martine Pronk. Data Stewardship on the map: A study of tasks and roles in Dutch research institutes. May 2019. URL:, doi:10.5281/zenodo.2669150.


Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Merc Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J. G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A. C. t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Mons, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan van der Lei, Erik van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, and Barend Mons. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data, 3(160018):1–9, Mar 2016. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.


Joseph S Wislar, Annette Flanagin, Phil B Fontanarosa, and Catherine D DeAngelis. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ, 2011. URL:, arXiv:, doi:10.1136/bmj.d6128.


Louise Woodley, Catherine Pratt, Rachael Ainsworth, Eva Amsen, Arne Bakker, Stefanie Butland, Stephanie O Donnell, Naomi Penfold, Allen Pope, Tom Quigley, and Emmy Tsang. Using virtual events to facilitate community building: event formats. Zenodo, Jul 2020. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3934385.


Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251):aac4716, Aug 2015. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716.


World Health Organisation. Events as they happen. Jul 2020. [Online; accessed 7. Jul. 2020]. URL: